Our Valued Sponsor
OpinionsConsumer ReviewsGuides and How TosCoffeeGeek ReviewsResourcesForums
Espresso: Questions and Answers
Is 6 months a realistic stale date for valve bag technology?
Don't suffer bad espresso
Package deals on the best machines from Izzo, Quick Mill, VBM, La Marzocco & more.
www.clivecoffee.com
 
Not Logged in: Log In to Postlog in
New Topics updated topics   New Posts new posts   Unanswered Posts new unanswered  
Search Discussion Board search   Discussion Board FAQ faq   Signup sign up  
Discussions > Espresso > Q and A > Is 6 months a...  
view previous topic | view next topic | view all topics
showing page 6 of 6 first page previous page
Author Messages
Michael_Teahan
Senior Member
Michael_Teahan
Joined: 15 Jan 2004
Posts: 137
Location: Los Angeles
Expertise: Professional

Vac Pot: Vintage for collecting only
Roaster: None
Posted Thu Feb 12, 2004, 4:16pm
Subject: Re: Is 6 months a realistic stale date for valve bag technology?
 

I never, ever meant to imply that  patents were not worth applying for; just that sometimes they don't pencil out from an industrial standpoint.  The industry gossip I have stems from working with Andre and Brasilia on the development and refinement of Brasilia's implementation of his patent.  They were European Patents, not US, and had a financial stake in the thermoplan project early on stemming from his Sistar machines.  THe terminal connections themselves (same for Brasilia and Thermoplan) are off the shelf items, so it is the implentation of them within the modular design that was the core of the patent as I understand.  

Please undersand that Andre and I did not have detailed discussion of the terms of his patents, only some of his frustrations.  He sold his interest in the thermoplan project long before he began work with Brasilia.  It was the ability to reomove modules sliding on rails without the use of tools that was the core element as I understand.  Thermoplan had the right to build the machine according to this design resulting from the financial arrangement they had with Andre, rights that survived his tenure there.  THose rights may not have allowed distribution outside of Europe as it was a key element of his being taken on by Brasilia.  Some arrangement, the details of which I am not privy to, prevented Starbux from retailing the Thermoplan machine and prohibited the Orbita from taking hold in the US--directly spawning the creation of their new super-auto with the same guts but different connectors.  Simply requiring an allen wrench to loosen the module might be enough to work around the patent, I am not sure.

Whatever was done to work out the details was done on Euro turf, and probably wouldn't show up here in patent documents.  I am sure that the thermoplan stuff was derivative of the sistar product--why else would Andre have worked with them.  I think all of the wrangling aged him pre-maturely.

Most of my research online with patents were with regard to frother systems.  European patents, while not necessarily transferred to US (grace periods notwithstanding, etc.) can still be effective without the transfer if the manufacturer is based in Europe.  Some regulations are forced on manufacturers regardless the destination.

La Marzocco has a patent for a pre-infusion system for their saturated group, I think in response to Starbux being interested, but they never built it as far as I know.  Patents are only as valuable as the marketability of the product.  A friend of mine hold some beverage system patents, but if a big player stomped on him with a marginally defensable design, he could never muster the dollars necessary to defend it.

A wood fired oven manufacturer in Texas sued another company in Washingtion over a patent he held for an integral burner for gas assist that was itself a copy of an Italian design he saw touring the factory two years earlier.  We, in fact, sold such an oven in Las Vegas two years prior to the patent application.  It should have nullified the patent protection; we provided sales receipts, brochures and the like from the manufacturer and even certified that the oven design --not patented in Europe pre-dated the patent.  The company in Washington is pushing $200,000 in legal bills and it is still on-going.  

The bottom line is that if people want to screw up your life, theyt will do it.  Contracts, patents, agreements, legal gymnastics--without deep pockets you don't have dick.  It isn't right and it sux, but from what I have seen on the inventor manufacturer side seems to be the case.  That is why Brasilia sees as much benefit from being first to market and exploit an idea rather than rely on patents for protection--unless, I suppose, it was particularly good.

If THEY had invented the SPIDEM frother, they might be whistling a different tune.

Its nearly all inside stuff, light on the gossip.  There are things I can't even talk about . . . . . .[;=}
back to top
 View Profile Visit website Contact via MSN Messenger Link to this post
cafedj
Senior Member


Joined: 3 Oct 2003
Posts: 653
Location: NC
Expertise: I love coffee

Espresso: Bialetti, Aeropress
Grinder: Rocky doserless
Vac Pot: Bodum
Drip: Behmor Brazen
Roaster: Counter Culture
Posted Fri Feb 13, 2004, 11:11am
Subject: Re: Is 6 months a realistic stale date for valve bag technology?
 

Please don't let me interrupt this discussion, I'm really enjoying it, but I just want to inject an observation related to the original topic.

About 2 weeks ago I bought a Black & Decker Freshguard vacuum gizmo:

Click Here (www.blackanddeckerappliances.com)

I had just received an order of beans, so I took an unopened valve bag from the roaster and put it inside one of the B&D plastic bags and vacuum sealed it.  Double bagging, as it were.  My rationale was the beans should be surrounded mostly by CO2 in the valve bag, and I'll remove most of the air outside the bag.  It created the expected tight brick.  I then froze it.

Yesterday I opened it up, and the resulting coffee is as fresh and rich as I've ever tasted.  I order from this roaster frequently and so am very familiar with the taste of their 2-3 day old beans.   I cannot detect any degradation.   It's only been 2 weeks but at this point the results show absolutely no signs of the so-called "fresh but lifeless" quality that vacuum storage has been accused of inducing.  Nor is there any discernible affect of freezing, whatsoever.

I have kept previous orders of beans from this roaster either on the shelf or in the freezer just in the valve bags for several weeks at a time, with generally a quite noticeable decline in taste.

I now have some beans stored just in a B&D plastic vacuum bag alone, and others in the hard plastic vacuum jars, both without the valve bags.  We'll see if having the beans more directly exposed to the vacuum level air is more detrimental, but at least at two weeks in a standard home freezer the double bag vacuum tehnique gets a very high rating.
back to top
 View Profile Link to this post
showing page 6 of 6 first page previous page
view previous topic | view next topic | view all topics
Discussions > Espresso > Q and A > Is 6 months a...  
New Topics updated topics   New Posts new posts   Unanswered Posts new unanswered     Search Discussion Board search   Discussion Board FAQ faq   Signup sign up  
Not Logged in: Log In to Postlog in
Discussions Quick Jump:
Symbols: New Posts= New Posts since your last visit      No New Posts= No New Posts since last visit     Go to most recent post= Newest post
Forum Rules:
No profanity, illegal acts or personal attacks will be tolerated in these discussion boards.
No commercial posting of any nature will be tolerated; only private sales by private individuals, in the "Buy and Sell" forum.
No SEO style postings will be tolerated. SEO related posts will result in immediate ban from CoffeeGeek.
No cross posting allowed - do not post your topic to more than one forum, nor repost a topic to the same forum.
Who Can Read The Forum? Anyone can read posts in these discussion boards.
Who Can Post New Topics? Any registered CoffeeGeek member can post new topics.
Who Can Post Replies? Any registered CoffeeGeek member can post replies.
Can Photos be posted? Anyone can post photos in their new topics or replies.
Who can change or delete posts? Any CoffeeGeek member can edit their own posts. Only moderators can delete posts.
Probationary Period: If you are a new signup for CoffeeGeek, you cannot promote, endorse, criticise or otherwise post an unsolicited endorsement for any company, product or service in your first five postings.
Learn @seattlecoffeegear
Learn all about coffee, watch videos, read how-to articles.
www.seattlecoffeegear.com
Home | Opinions | Consumer Reviews | Guides & How Tos | CoffeeGeek Reviews | Resources | Forums | Contact Us
CoffeeGeek.com, CoffeeGeek, and Coffee Geek, along with all associated content & images are copyright ©2000-2014 by Mark Prince, all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Content, code, and images may not be reused without permission. Usage of this website signifies agreement with our Terms and Conditions. (0.217679023743)
Privacy Policy | Copyright Info | Terms and Conditions | CoffeeGeek Advertisers | RSS | Find us on Google+